untitled
viviti

DATE: 2005

RATING: R for language, disturbing themes, and brief violence

DIRECTOR: Bennet Miller

WRITER: Dan Futterman

CAST: Philip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener, Clifton Collins, Jr., Mark Pellegrino, Chris Cooper, Bruce Greenwood

IMDB RATING: 7.9/10

BUDGET: $7 million

BOX OFFICE: $28 million, in limited release over a period of about six months; it made a nice profit due to low costs.  If only Hollywood would learn...

AWARDS
     Academy Awards
          Winner: Best Actor
          Nominated: Best Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Supporting Actress (Keener)
     BAFTA Awards
          Winner: Best Actor
          Nominated: Best Film, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Supporting Actress (Keener)
     Golden Globes
          Winner: Best Actor

Hoffman also won about 20 other awards from various societies; Keener, Miller, and Futterman also had several additional nominations and wins.  The critics LOVED this movie.

Capote

2005

* * 1/2

            In 1959, a small Kansas town is shattered by the brutal murders of four people.  Writer Truman Capote (Phillip Seymour Hoffman), along with his friend Harper Lee (Catherine Keener), travels there to write about the effect on the town, but ends up writing a "nonfiction novel" about the killers, painting a portrait of what the two killers were like --- and, in the process, emotionally destorying himself.  This true drama is certainly well made.  The script, by Dan Futterman, is intelligent, creating incredibly human characters and real dialogue.  Hoffman does a good job capturing his eccentric subject, and Keener is superb as Lee.  The period detail is absolutely perfect.  Director Bennett Miller gives a very talky, slow story enough energy to keep your interest.  Miller and cinematographer Adam Kimmel create heartbreakingly beautiful yet subtle images throughout, assisted by an equally beautiful and subtle score by Mychael Danna.  And yet, for some reason, the film never grabs you emotionally at all.  Never once did I really have any strong feelings for any of the characters or events.  It's a sad, dismal story that's interesting, but not that interesting.  Only the images provoked any emotion from me.  And, while it is intelligent, it didn't leave me thinking about anything.  In the end, as Capote says about something else, "I frankly don't see what the fuss is all about."  There really isn't anything here that's compelling, moving, or entertaining.  It's just intelligent and well made in every other way.  In other words, this is a critic's film.  It you're interested in a quiet, subtle, and intelligent drama, this is top-notch, but it fails for any kind of actual appeal or success on any level other than admiration.  Also, if you want to see brilliant imagery in the film, you can't get much better than this.  But if you don't have exceptional patience when watching a film, you will fall asleep.  In fact, I like slowly-paced films, and my mind wandered several times.  This was nontheless (and in spite of a tiny box office and many superior and higher-profile films) nominated for Best Picture, Director, and Screenplay at the Oscars, as well as deserved nominations for Hoffman --- who won, although personnally, I would have given the statuette to David Strathairn in Good Night, And Good Luck --- and Keener.  However, Kimmel was ripped off.           

This Website Built and Hosted for Free at Bravenet.com

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com